Monday, November 23, 2009

Looking Ahead to the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference: The Future of Energy


With the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference approaching, it will be interesting to see how the topic of energy will be addressed. There is considerable evidence demonstrating that the overconsumption of fossil fuels has contributed to climate change. In fact, the last two decades alone have seen more energy consumed than all human history combined. Another issue correlated with the overconsumption of fossil fuels is oil depletion (better known as ‘peak oil’). The decline of oil has produced a decline in the ‘net energy’ of conventional oil. This means that not only is less oil being produced, but the remaining oil is more difficult and costly to extract. Combined, these issues compromise human health, global economies and the environment on a massive scale.


One would hope that such threats to human existence would arouse action from government leaders but so far, the response of most governments has been inadequate. Solutions have included desperate attempts to find the few, untapped oil reserves and mining the Canadian tar sands. These proposed solutions perpetuate the problem rather than solve it.


Renewable energy use is one alternative that has been postulated to mitigate issues of climate change and fossil fuel depletion. As such, its implementation needs to be high on the policy agenda of nations. However, the reality is that renewable energy technologies will not be able to completely replace oil and satisfy growing energy demands. A real answer to the current energy issue must involve renewable energy plus efforts toward conservation, efficiency, and reduced consumption.

On a positive note, the impending energy crisis provides businesses an opportunity to adopt sustainable practices that are not only eco-friendly, but also cost efficient. Businesses should first identify the specific outcomes they want to achieve. Outcomes could include saving money for the year, having a longer-term goal to replace outdated equipment, or demonstrating green credentials to customers and suppliers. Next, businesses should perform an energy audit. A professional energy audit will demonstrate how efficiently energy is being used and highlight opportunities for energy cost savings. It can also show ways to improve productivity. Energy audits include everything from basic audit of the efficiency of the products and appliances used on the premises to a detailed analysis of machinery, cooling towers, waste systems etc. Lastly, businesses can adopt green building technologies and materials by using more energy-efficient lighting, the latest in innovative window glazing, higher R-value insulation, as well as room occupancy sensors.

It’s a simple fact that when businesses manage their energy well, their profits improve. Energy use is not a fixed cost. There is plenty businesses can due to reduce their consumption patterns while still maintaining their profit margins.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Carbon Foresight signs Copenhagen Communiqué on Climate Change


Carbon Foresight has joined a prestigious group of international businesses in signing the Copenhagen Communiqué on Climate Change. The Communiqué was initiated by The Prince of Wales’s Corporate Leaders Group on Climate Change (CLG) in June of 2009 and has been endorsed by the likes General Electric, Sun Microsystems, Deloitte, and many others.

Carbon Foresight signed the communiqué in the lead up to the United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP 15 in December to call for a strong political response and clear guidelines for states and organizations globally. Without clear political objectives and legislative mandates, organizations are not likely to go beyond their current business strategies and further integrate sustainability into their core business strategy, drive clean technologies, develop environmentally beneficial products, or increase their operational efficiencies.

The Copenhagen Communiqué calls for an ambitious, robust and equitable global deal on climate change that responds credibly to the scale and urgency of the crises facing the world today – and includes the following recommended actions:
  • Any agreement must establish a global emissions cap and long-term reduction pathway for all greenhouse gas emissions and sources, for the period 2013 to 2050 (with interim targets). These targets will need to be guided by science to ensure global greenhouse gas concentrations are stabilized below critical thresholds. When stating this, we understand that there is an emerging consensus behind an objective of limiting global average temperature rise to less than 2 degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels and that this will require global emissions to peak and begin to decline rapidly within the next decade.
  • Developed countries need to take on immediate and deep emission reduction commitments that are much higher than the global average, and which are backed up with credible strategies to de-carbonize their economies. The developed countries need to demonstrate that low-carbon growth is both achievable and desirable.
  • Developing countries will need to play their part by drawing up their own emission reduction plans in line with their common but differentiated responsibilities and capabilities. The least developed economies need additional assistance including increased and adequate financing, and expanded cooperation to help them adapt to and join the new low-carbon economy.
Key supporting elements of any agreement should include:
  • Credible measurement, reporting and verification of emissions which are vital to measuring progress against the objectives of an effective climate treaty.
  • Measures to deliver a robust global greenhouse gas emissions market in order to provide the most effective, efficient and equitable emission reductions. It would be comprised of a growing series of national or regional “cap-and-trade” markets linked together, in which the “caps” are brought down in line with the targets that have been adopted for emission reduction.
  • Additional policy measures, because a strong carbon price alone will not be enough to deliver the level and nature of change required across each economy. Measures will be needed; to deliver a step-change in energy efficiency, to promote the rapid development, demonstration and wide deployment of low-carbon technologies and also to stimulate new markets for low-carbon goods and services.

The strength of an agreement will be judged on its ability to drive substantive action both inside and outside the UN process, at national and international levels, but in line with the principles agreed in Copenhagen. A strong, effective and equitable international climate framework will stimulate the domestic policy interventions, bilateral and regional deals that are needed as a matter of urgency to deliver on intermediate and long-term reduction targets and accelerate construction of the low-carbon economy.

The problem of climate change is solvable – many of the technologies required are available today while others can be developed if the right incentives are in place. The policies needed are relatively clear, and the costs of transition are manageable, even in the current economic climate.

The one thing we do not have is time. Delay is not an option.

Monday, March 2, 2009

SAP aims to slash greenhouse gas emissions

Software giant SAP AG plans to cut its greenhouse gas emissions in half during the next decade as part of a broad sustainability initiative. The Walldorf, Germany-based company (NYSE: SAP) is striving for a 51% reduction of its direct and indirect emissions of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases by 2020. Hitting the target would return SAP to its year-2000 emissions level of 250,000 metric tons of CO2.
In addition to slashing its carbon emissions, SAP plans to roll out software that would help its more than 80,000 customers in 120 countries track their energy consumption as well as manage environmental risks in their supply chains. The firms account for about 5 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases, which is one-sixth of the total amount generated by humans and 10,000 times the amount generated by SAP. Read on...

Friday, February 27, 2009

The Elephant in the Room: Carving Up Scope 3 Emissions Across a Value Chain

For a Fortune 1000 company today, it is easy to be casual about Scope 3 emissions. When it comes to measurement guidance, the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) GHG Protocol considers the quantification of Scope 3 emissions as optional when preparing an overall corporate GHG inventory.

As for current or pending regulation, it is unlikely that companies will be held accountable for their Scope 3 emissions. And when it comes to reputation, it is understandable that companies choose to ignore a category that typically represents an exponentially larger footprint than their Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Logical decisions all.

But in the aggregate, these decisions have led to three unintended effects: one pedantic, one peculiar and one perilous.... Check out the full article from Emma Stewart,Corporate Environmental Strategy Consultant.

Friday, February 13, 2009

"Lost Generation": A Sustainability Manifesto

Flips everything on its head.
...have a look.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Ray Anderson on Sustainability

Ray Anderson is founder and chairman of Interface Inc., the world's largest manufacturer of modular carpet for commercial and residential applications and a leading producer of commercial broadloom and commercial fabrics.

He is "known in environmental circles for his advanced and progressive stance on industrial ecology and sustainability." Since 1995, he has reduced Interface's waste by a third, and plans to make the company sustainable by 2020.

Alex Steffen: "A Shpiel on Sustainability"

An intro to sustainability, its challenges and opportunities: